The book did an excellent job in teaching the concepts behind philosophy such as idealism and empiricism but it never there was no evidence behind these concepts. I understand that the book was not trying to be bias in it's influence on the reader's personal view, but I think that it would have adequate to include evidence such as scientific evidence behind concepts such as the question of whether or not there is a god. I feel that this would help the reader in their pursuit of finding their own personal philosophy if there was evidence. As for me, I think there will have to be much more reading on the subject in order to fully come to a conclusion on where I stand.
All in all, this is an excellent book for anyone that is willing to do a little extra thinking while reading.
Seems like an interesting book. When you referred to how you wished the author had mentioned if there was a god or not, does this mean you think that religion is the key to philosophy? Do you think God is a main part to finding personal philosophies? Is there ways He could be exempt from it entirely? Overall though, great post!
ReplyDelete